05-05-2011, 04:28 PM
:o :o 10 dls el par de Lentes! ,suena demasiado bien para ser verdad
http://www.lg.com/us/tv-audio-video/dis ... /index.jsp
Yo ando buscando una nueva tele 3d para mi cuarto y esta es una buena opcion. :?
edit: mejor no ,ya salio el peine
Conclusion
Review
http://www.flatpanelshd.com/review.php? ... 1301662476
http://www.lg.com/us/tv-audio-video/dis ... /index.jsp
Yo ando buscando una nueva tele 3d para mi cuarto y esta es una buena opcion. :?
edit: mejor no ,ya salio el peine
Cita:passive 3DTVs in theory have half resolution because the two different pictures are packed into the same frame. On active 3DTVs (like all 2010 3D models and most 2011 3D models) the two different pictures are packed in different frames, thus delivering Full HD resolution.
Cita:LG’s Cinema 3D has a softer 3D picture than Panasonic’s 3D plasma TV.,You still feel that it’s a HD 3D picture but it’s not 100 % as crisp as Panasonic GT30.
Cita:crosstalk is extremely low. It’s not eliminated but it’s almost invisible and lower in our stress tests than on Panasonic’s 3D plasma TV even though we have praised Panasonic for its low crosstalk in the past.
Conclusion
Cita:Cinema 3D is a great alternative. Despite the slightly less detailed 3D pictures it has tons of advantages such as almost zero crosstalk, cheap and lightweight 3D glasses without batteries, and no flicker. The polarized 3D glasses also cause less eyestrain in the long run. Based on that, I’m ready to call the Cinema 3D technology “3D for the masses”. It’s easier, cheaper and provides a good experience. Welcome Cinema 3D, you have potential.
However, the absolutely best 3D experience is still achieved with high-end 3D plasma TVs such as Panasonic GT30.
Review
http://www.flatpanelshd.com/review.php? ... 1301662476